Pineapples and Jigsaw Puzzles

It is a serious thing

just to be alive

on this fresh morning

in the broken world. (Mary Oliver)

A kitchen table with an electric kettle just visible in the background. A large fresh pineapple sits in the foreground beside two puzzles boxes.

Cutting up pineapples is inherently messy and time-consuming. That means everyone has an opinion on how it should be done.

A recent observation from a guest (yes, we are beginning to have those!)—“okay, that’s neater than the way I do it, but I can do it faster”—provoked me into a defensive “and why, precisely, should I do it faster? Just so that I can get it done and then move onto something else that I will also do as fast as possible just to get it done?”  

If everything I do in a day is done just to get it done, what have I done that was joyous in the doing?

Putting together jigsaw puzzles has somehow raised the same question.

I must be one of those rare people who prefer doing jigsaw puzzles alone. There’s a story that needs to be told here in self-defense. As a late-born (and therefore rather solitary) child on a farm, I didn’t have many opportunities to acquire necessary social skills. Mostly I played alone, when chores were finished. I was probably at least 13 when the first jigsaw puzzle ever came into my hands as a gift from a distant aunt.

The picture was one of those English cottages set in deep dark woods on the verge of autumn. It took me many long evenings before I got those 500 pieces into the right places. I was so absorbed I knew nothing of passing time until ordered to put out my light and get to bed. I admired the finished product for days, not wanting to take it apart, ever. Until the desire to put it together again won out.  

Years later, in the family of the man who became my husband, I discovered that jigsaw puzzles were a family activity. Everybody gathered around to put pieces together. It wasn’t exactly a process I would describe as driven, but the plan was definitely to get it done. Meanwhile, stories were told, gossip was shared, snacks were fetched. Each person worked on one area and rejoiced when it could be attached to the whole. Sometimes it took a couple of evenings out of a weekend family gathering. That’s when I first noted the loss I felt when I saw that someone else had finished what I’d been working on.

There’s a reason that jigsaw puzzles became so popular during the early days of the pandemic. When all the world is falling apart and we’re denied our usual social distractions, the putting together of pieces to make something beautiful is soothing. It feels creative without the agony of actual creation. It gives us control, and meaning: we begin with chaos—a heap of fragments in a box—and end with a perfect order in which each tiny piece fits into its place.

A brightly colored jigsaw puzzle is in its early stage of being put together. The outside pieces are in place; there's a heap of pieces in the middle of the puzzle mat and even more pieces in the box at the side. The box cover with the picture of many brightly colored hearts sits upright in the background.

For me, the putting together is the whole point. I own it all, both the chaos and the order. It is the doing I delight in; the “done” part is a form of good-bye.

Which is why I recently responded to a casual offer—“would you like us to help you get your puzzle finished?”—with a stammering, awkward refusal. It was a gracious social gesture, an entirely laudable wish to do something together, but just for a moment, I felt as if something that was mine was about to be taken away from me, as if the goal had co-opted the process.

My dilemma had a solution that made sense to me: I offered a different puzzle, still in its box. If I know from the get-go that the puzzle will be a communal effort, I happily join the being together, which is, in the end, even better than the putting together. Actually, the putting together becomes a different process when many eyes and hands find order in the midst of chaos. It is useful to be reminded, especially these days, that shared fragments are much less fragmented, less chaotic.  

A whole pineapple in the foreground beside a wooden bowl of apples, on the  shelf of an oak china cabinet. In the background are several recipe books, a china elephant serving as book end and a few puzzles.

If I am to be happy with pineapples and jigsaw puzzles—and all manner of doings—I shall have to practice sorting out the doing from the done, and which is important when.

Working together with other people requires me to let go almost entirely of the final product. It may or may not be what I had envisioned. My perfectionism (sometimes a virtue, sometimes a grievous fault) needs to be held in check during the doing and completely set aside for the done. What matters is the warmth of shared effort, the laughter, the swapping of stories, the mutual encouragement. It helps me to see two processes at once: the task at hand which needs to get done, and the happy work of building friendships which needs doing even more (and luckily never arrives at a state of doneness).  

When working alone on a task, I hope for wisdom to know just how important it really is to get it done. Is efficiency what matters? Is this just to get it done and out of the way? How often shall I let that urgency spoil the intrinsic pleasures of the doing? Surely I can take time oftener to feel the evanescent tickle of soap bubbles in the dish water, the soft yieldedness of bread dough taking shape under my hands, the miracle of color in cut fruit, the crumbling of soil in my fingers as I transfer a trembling wisp of a pansy into the next size of pot.

Close-up of cut pineapple chunks on a wooden cutting board, the tip of heavy knife visible in the bottom right corner.

A pox on getting it all done just to get it done! A life lived deeply might be just as full as the life lived headlong forward.

A Tipping Point

Mano’s Restaurant in Saskatoon

            I will apologize, at once, for an inexcusable pun in my title—I mean “tipping” as in voluntarily adding money to a restaurant bill to pay the server directly. At the same time, I do also mean that we might just have reached a point when we can recognize that tipping is a demeaning, demoralizing, exploitative practice that needs to end.

Now after that provocative statement, I should write a proper introduction and ease all my readers into a topic that requires gentleness and diplomacy:

            Some weeks ago now, on CBC’s The Current I heard Matt Galloway interview Corey Mintz, a chef, a restaurant critic and an author, concerning his latest book The Next Supper: The End of Restaurants as We Knew Them, and What Comes After. Mintz begins with the plain fact that restaurants are among the businesses most affected by the pandemic. All of a sudden, we Canadians, who typically eat out rather often, who can barely imagine getting together with friends without visiting some coffee shop, bar, or restaurant, couldn’t visit any of those places except to take out food to eat at home, with only our household. It was a terrific shock to our system. Now that health restrictions have eased, in some places, and dining out is possible again, owners are having trouble finding staff. That would indicate that something’s wrong. Perhaps plenty of things.

 As I listened to Galloway and Mintz talk about what it’s like to work as a cook or as a server or as an owner, I remembered my own years-long experience as a restaurant server, first in summers only so I could pay for my university education, then full-time for a few years because other jobs proved unattainable and the rent needed to be paid. That meant serving the public, trying to adhere to the principle of “the customer is always right” (although I knew very well that customers could be foolish, ignorant, and downright mean), and depending on the tips to make ends meet. Even then, even when I walked home with pockets heavy from collected change—and bills—I had hated the practice of tipping.

            Here’s why I felt that way, and there’s no ranking order to my objections:

            It allowed my various bosses to pay me the minimum wage without regard to how much experience I had, how efficient I might be in getting the work done, or how willing I was to do the backroom jobs (making salads, cleaning work stations, cleaning the ice cream dispenser, etc.) that not only earned me no tips but reduced the time I could have spent on the floor earning tips. According to Corey Mintz, in some provinces, wage laws allow restaurants to pay even less than minimum wage because of tipping. In fact, Mintz talked about high-end restaurants that don’t pay their staff at all; they “allow” them the “privilege” of working in the establishment, leaving them entirely dependent on the generosity of patrons. This is demeaning. As Mintz pointed out, we wouldn’t dream of paying our dentists or electricians in that fashion. It is utterly unprofessional. Isn’t it time that we recognized that serving food and wine to the public is also a profession and worthy of dignity?

Tipping corrupts the relationship between server and served. I did not initially understand that because my first job was in a private businessmen’s club (and yes, it was only men back then) where tipping was automatic and official. A percentage was added to all bills and given to the wait-staff as part of their paycheque. So I could treat all customers with respect and offer good service, simply because that was my job, not because it might garner more tips. Not until I got into a hotel dining-room, and later into a nightclub, did I realize how quickly servers learn to evaluate all customers according to their tipping potential. The best service is offered to those who are deemed to be well-off and sophisticated. The customer who hesitantly chooses the cheapest item on the menu will not be served with the same alacrity and promptness as the customer who begins with a pricey wine. I was often ashamed of the way that I viewed people as tip-dispensers or tip-withholders, but it seemed inevitable.

 Because customers are tip-dispensers, servers are tempted to see one another as competition rather than as allies. I witnessed angry arguments over who got which section of the dining-room, nasty allegations of tip-stealing off the tables (back when cash was the primary method of payment), refusals to assist other servers unless some portion of the tip was surrendered. There were quarrels when servers lied about their take to avoid sharing more of it with the cooks or bartenders or busboys, not to mention the assumption that one did not report tips on income tax forms. All of that, too, was demeaning.

  Of the deep embarrassment of receiving an exorbitant tip from someone too drunk to tell the difference between a dollar bill and twenty dollar bill, I would prefer to say little. My shame is even deeper when I remember the brief weeks in a nightclub when I gave in to the temptation to overcharge obstreperous and obnoxious customers. My friend and fellow server first suggested it as a way of getting back at customers who were rude and difficult. I gave the subversive practice its name – “an aggravation charge.” It was of no financial benefit to us because the bills were paid to the house, yet it allowed us to feel, briefly, as if we had some agency, some way of redressing the frustrations of having to be obsequious to the most boorish of customers. While strictly speaking, this had nothing to do with tipping, I see now that it was part and parcel of the lack of dignity that with which servers were generally treated then. According to Mintz, that lack of dignity is still the issue. Tipping, after all, had its origins in the days of slavery when one would throw a coin at a slave and demand a dance or other favour.

 In the years after my server days, I dutifully tipped whenever I ate out and encouraged whatever companion I was with to do likewise. What is far more important to me is that I didn’t forget what I had learned backstage in the restaurant. It was my duty – no, my privilege – to treat servers fairly and respectfully. They were fellow human beings who were sharing their time and skills with me, never mind the corruptions of the system which hired and paid them (as little as possible, of course).

            If, in my city, a restaurant was established that made tipping obsolete and paid its staff appropriately, I would happily patronize it – when I’m ready to return to eating out. There is a particular pleasure in savouring a meal without having had to cook it or serve it or feel obligated to help in someone else’s kitchen. All of those are tasks that I have happily done; it’s part of the privilege of living with others and sharing food with friends and extended family. Nevertheless, the joy of eating out and having what Mintz calls a “magical evening” is worth enough that I believe we should extend dignity to all the skilled people who can make it happen. They are professionals, or are on their way to becoming professionals, and I would be glad to know that they have been adequately trained and are paid with a decent salary.

No work is insignificant. All labour that uplifts humanity has dignity and importance and should be undertaken with painstaking excellence.

Martin Luther King, Jr.

  

Mano’s Restaurant, taken before the dinner hour.